| |
Injection Techniques with Botulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Blepharospasm
By Mark Stacy, M.D.
Director, Muhammad Ali Parkinson Center and Movement Disorder Clinic Barrow Neurological Institute
Phoenix, Arizona
The development of Botulinum toxin, a muscle paralyzing agent from the
bacteria, Clostridium botulinum, has produced major advances in the
treatment of dystonia (such as blepharospasm or torticollis), hemifacial
spasm, tremor, tic disorders, and a variety of other conditions - including
those annoying crow's feet! Because such a wide range of injection
techniques are used in treating blepharospasm, a group of ophthalmologists
and neurologists recognized as "experts" by the BEBRF were surveyed for
injection location, and the amount of toxin injected on the initial visit.
The purpose of this highly unscientific survey was not to determine the
"best" approach to treat any individual, but to provide the reader with some
understanding of the number and location of injections at each visit, and to
quantify the amount of toxin that was given at a typical office visit. Each
of the respondents were asked to list typical dosages, dilution, and number
of injections for an imaginary patient. Remember that clinical judgment at
each patient encounter will vary any of these data.
Each physician was mailed a diagram (see below) and asked to mark each
injection site, units of toxin injected per site (initially and on average),
and the dilution factor for the toxin. Of the eight respondents, 5
clinicians always diluted the toxin at a rate of 100 units (1 vial) per
milliliter. One respondent used this dilution for dosages greater than 5
units per injection, but would dilute to a concentration of 100 units (1
vial) per 2 milliliters for smaller dosages. This will allow for more
diffusion around the injection site, presumably providing a more even
effect. Conversely, in instances where side effects, such as lid drooping
(ptosis), double vision (diplopia), or tearing occurs, injection with less
diluted toxin (100 units in 1/2 milliliter) may allow more effective
response without these side effects. Two physicians did not indicate their
dilution factor. Dosages varied per respondent in terms of injection site
and total dose, On average, the total dosage ranged from 30 - 60 units
(15-30 units per eye). This average range did not differ from the initial
dosage, but all responders indicated that a gradual increase in the dose is
necessary to gain optimum benefit in many patients. Dosage per site was most
often 5 units, with two clinicians using 2.5 and another using 7.5 unit
doses. [See table]
| |
Total Dosage |
Dilution |
Number of injections |
| Neurologist |
|
|
|
| 1 |
50 units |
100 units/ml |
10 |
| 2 |
50 units |
100 units/ml |
12 |
| 3 |
60 units |
50 units/ml |
12 |
| 4 |
60 units |
100 units/ml |
10 |
| Ophthalmologist |
|
|
|
| 1 |
50 units |
|
10 |
| 2 |
50 units |
100 units/ml |
9 |
| 3 |
50 units |
|
12 |
| 4 |
30 units |
100 units/ml |
12 |
Injection locations varied between these clinicians, but were more
consistent among neurologists. The number of injections per visit varied
from 9 to 12. with 5 of the 8 respondents injecting each patient 10 times.
All physicians injected the frontalis muscles (above the eyebrow); upper
lids and lower lids. Two neurologists and one ophthalmologist injected
lateral to each eye. Among ophthalmologists, upper lid injections were
divided equally between injection on the lid and higher in the fold of the
upper lid, while all neurologists injected on the lid. [See diagrams]

In summary, the physicians selected to participate in this survey were
recommended from the BEBRF, and loosely represent every geographic location
in the country Although some variability exists between injection location
choices between the respondents, the number of injections and dosages are
highly consistent. The treatment of blepharospasm involves science, art and
good communication between a patient and clinician. With improved
understanding of injection approach. communication will also improve, and
hopefully, a better result for the patient.
Back
|
|